Why was this article included in the December 20 Newsletter when there are serious questions about the data which is the basis for the arguments? Since the first comment appeared in September there have been many criticisms here of the "playing with statistics" and "single-minded" approach. If Mr Hans Voerknecht from Fietsberaad and Theo Zeegers from Fietsersbond say there's problems, why has the Fietsberaad again published this stor